Consent-first meeting capture
Recording starts only after the client agrees, with notices set for all-party consent states.
For RIAs and independent advisors who lose evenings to meeting notes: AI that drafts notes, tasks, and follow-ups for your review and archives every draft.
5+ hrs
Back per advisor each week
1archive
For every AI draft
How your project runs
01 · FreeTeams we have built for:








The Problem
It grows with every household you add. Each review leaves notes, CRM tasks, follow-up emails, and records your compliance team must keep, and most of it gets written after hours.
Notes
Meeting notes get rebuilt from memory hours later.
Notes
AI drafts notes from the transcript minutes after the meeting ends.
CRM
Tasks promised in the meeting don't reach the CRM.
CRM
Tasks and notes are drafted into Wealthbox, Redtail, or Salesforce for review.
Records
Notes pasted into public chatbots leave no archive.
Records
Every AI draft and final copy goes to your archiving vendor.
Prep
Review prep means clicking through several systems.
Prep
A client brief pulls CRM notes and planning data onto one page.
Your 2 p.m. review covered a Roth conversion, a college fund, and a beneficiary change. By 4 p.m. you've had two more meetings. That evening you rebuild the notes from memory, type tasks into Redtail, and draft a follow-up email that compliance still has to review. Some advisors have started pasting notes into a public chatbot, with no archive and no vendor review. Doing nothing means slower follow-ups, thinner records, and an exam question you'd rather not answer.
We start with consent: clients agree to recording before any meeting is captured. Then the AI drafts notes, tasks, and a follow-up email from the transcript and puts them in your CRM for review. Nothing reaches a client until you approve it, and every draft lands in your archive. You end the day with notes done, not a stack of half-remembered meetings.
Consent before every recording
Clients agree to recording first, with a notice that fits each state's consent rules.
Every AI draft archived
Drafts and finals go to your archive, so your books and records stay complete.
Advisor approves every message
Follow-ups wait for your approval and, where your procedures require it, compliance review.
Our AI for Financial Advisors Process
You see where the hours go, approve every compliance rule, and test with mock meetings before AI touches a real client conversation.
We map how notes, tasks, and client messages move today, from meeting to CRM to archive. You get the jobs ranked by hours spent, plus a note on what your CRM's own AI features already cover.
What's Included
Each build covers consent, meeting notes, CRM updates, client prep, review queues, and archiving, so your AI assistant for financial advisors fits your compliance program.
Compare Options
Note taker apps start in a day, and general chatbots cost little. Here is how the best AI tools for financial advisors compare on records, review, and data control.
| Feature | DeveloperLookBest fit | Note taker app | General AI chatbot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to start | 4 to 14 weeks by plan | A day or two | Same day |
| CRM updates | Your CRM fields and format | Supported CRMs only | Copy and paste |
| Record archiving | Every draft to your archive | Varies by vendor | No firm archive |
| Compliance review | Queue your CCO designs | Vendor review options | None built in |
| Client data control | Your accounts, your retention | Vendor keeps a copy | Depends on the plan |
| Cost model | Fixed project price | Monthly fee per advisor | Monthly seat fee |
| Workflow fit | Your notes, tasks, and forms | Vendor's standard format | Whatever you prompt |
| Best fit | Firms with set procedures | Solo advisors starting fast | Personal drafting only |
Projects We've Built
Finance websites, apps, and dashboards we designed and built. They show our financial data and client portal work, not advisor AI workflows, which we scope per firm.




What Our Clients Say
Feedback from teams we have built websites, apps, and platforms for.
We had a pretty specific idea of what we wanted our website to become, but I wasn’t sure how easily we could explain all of it to a development team. There were quite a few moving parts, and we were working toward a deadline, so I expected a few things to get lost along the way. That never really happened. They understood what we were trying to achieve, kept us updated throughout the process, and got everything ready within the agreed timeline. The final site feels much easier to navigate, works beautifully on mobile, and is noticeably smoother for our customers. It was a huge relief seeing the original idea actually turn into the website we had in mind.
The mobile experience is probably my favourite part of the new site. We had spent a lot of time making sure the desktop version looked right, and the team kept pushing us to think about how everything would actually feel on a phone too. They were right. The navigation is clean, the interactions feel natural, and everything we’ve tested so far works exactly as it should. They also went through the links, forms, integrations, and other details more than once before launch, which I really appreciated. And even after going live, we could still reach out when something came up. The whole process felt friendly, organised, and surprisingly straightforward.
What I appreciate most is that the website is actually easy for us to manage now. We can update content ourselves instead of sending a developer a message every time we need to change something small. They also paid attention to the technical SEO side, which mattered to us because we didn’t want a new website to create problems for the traffic we already had. I’ve probably asked more questions than I should have since launch, but every question has been handled patiently and without any fuss. The team is easy to work with, they explain things clearly, and when we need something changed, they focus on getting it done rather than making the process complicated.
1,250+
Projects shipped
10+
Years of experience
Top 3%
Upwork Top Rated Plus
5 stars
Average review score
1,250+
Projects shipped
10+
Years of experience
Top 3%
Upwork Top Rated Plus
5 stars
Average review score

Want results like these?
Tell us what you are building. You get a reply within 24 hours on business days, then a written estimate.
Work Culture
We build AI solutions for financial advisors the way your CCO would want them: consent first, every draft archived, and no output reaching a client unreviewed.
Your CCO approves the consent script, retention, and review queues before we build. The AI follows written procedures you can show an examiner.
The AI drafts notes and messages, not recommendations. Advice and suitability stay with your licensed advisors, and prompts refuse requests for picks.
Every AI draft and final goes to your archiving vendor, not a side app. Your books and records stay complete when AI joins the workflow.
Notes and tasks live in Wealthbox, Redtail, or Salesforce, not in our system. If you switch tools, nothing is stranded with us.
If an off-the-shelf note taker already covers your firm, we'll tell you before we quote. A custom build only makes sense where your procedures need it.
Model, meeting, and integration accounts are in your firm's name. You can run, change, or end the setup without asking us.
Overview
DeveloperLook builds AI for financial advisors that turns client meetings into CRM notes, tasks, and follow-up drafts, and prepares a brief before each review. Builds include consent-first recording, CRM updates in Wealthbox, Redtail, or Salesforce, and archiving of every draft. Prices start at $1,450, a first workflow goes live in 4 to 6 weeks, and the AI gives no investment advice.
DEVELOPERLOOK
Project facts · AI for Financial Advisors
Reviewed 28 Oct 2026 by Saimul Islam
Good fit
Independent advisors writing notes at night
You hold back-to-back client reviews, then spend evenings turning scribbles into CRM notes and follow-up emails before the details fade.
RIAs comparing AI note takers
You want an AI note taker for financial advisors that writes into your CRM and archive, not another app holding its own copy of client data.
Firms on Wealthbox, Redtail, or Salesforce
Your CRM holds households, tasks, and review cycles, and you want AI software for financial advisors that updates it instead of replacing it.
Compliance officers asked to approve AI
Your advisors already want AI tools, and you need every draft archived, client messages reviewed, and vendors documented before anyone says yes.
Dual registrants with FINRA obligations
Your firm also has broker-dealer reps, so AI notes and client messages must meet FINRA Rule 4511 and SEC Rule 17a-4 recordkeeping.
Not a fit
AI that picks investments
You want AI to recommend securities or build client portfolios. We don't build that: investment advice stays with your licensed advisors.
CRM not set up yet
Your CRM is half set up and households are missing. CRM for Financial Advisors should come first, then AI on top of clean data.
Budget under $1,450
Your budget is under $1,450. An off-the-shelf advisor note taker may cover one advisor's meetings, and we'll tell you if it fits.
No security program yet
You first need a written security program and vendor reviews. Cybersecurity for Financial Advisors and RIAs covers that before AI is added.
Not sure we're the right fit?
Book a free call or message us. We'll tell you honestly whether we're the right team.
Pricing
These are starting points in USD. Your final price depends on your CRM, your archive, and the number of advisors and workflows, and you get a fixed proposal after a free discovery call.
For Agencies
You own the relationship with the advisory firm. We supply the AI build behind it: consent flows, CRM and archive connections, review queues, and written procedures, delivered under your brand for your client's compliance team.
White label: your client only ever sees your brand
Send the firm's CRM, archive vendor, advisor count, and the hours they want back.
We return a fixed proposal, timeline, and compliance plan under your brand.
We build, test with mock meetings, and hand over procedures you present.
Send the firm's CRM, archive vendor, advisor count, and the hours they want back.
We return a fixed proposal, timeline, and compliance plan under your brand.
We build, test with mock meetings, and hand over procedures you present.
The Right Technology for Your Project
We pick models with business terms that exclude training on firm data, meeting tools your advisors already use, and documented CRM APIs.
FAQ
Straight answers on cost, recordkeeping, recording consent, investment analysis, and planning software.
Saimul IslamFounder & CEO, DeveloperLookStill have questions?
Send a message or book a call with the team.
AI for financial advisors at DeveloperLook starts at $1,450 for a meeting notes workflow with CRM drafts and archiving. An advisor productivity suite with client prep briefs and a compliance queue starts at $3,950, and firm-wide workflows start at $8,300. Model and meeting tool usage stay on your own vendor bills.
A meeting notes workflow goes live in 4 to 6 weeks, including compliance sign-off. A productivity suite takes 7 to 10 weeks, and firm-wide workflows take 11 to 14. CRM API access and your archiving vendor's intake setup usually set the pace, so we request both in week 1.
Meeting note takers reclaim the most time, followed by CRM task drafting and client prep briefs. Independent advisors without support staff feel it most, because they write their own notes and follow-ups. The AI tools for financial advisors that last are the ones that write into your CRM and archive, so nothing gets typed twice.
Financial advisors use AI to summarize research, compare fund documents, and explain portfolio changes in plain language, checking every figure themselves. AI shouldn't pick securities or set allocations, and FINRA Regulatory Notice 24-09 reminds firms that existing rules apply to AI tools. Our builds draft explanations from your own research for your review.
Tools that combine CRM notes, life events, and planning data deliver the most client insight. Our client prep brief puts recent conversations, open tasks, upcoming required distributions, and plan changes on one page before each review. The advisor decides what matters, and the brief keeps last meeting's promises in view.
Planning software vendors are adding AI features such as document data extraction and plain-language plan summaries. The bigger change happens around the software: AI moves data between meetings, the CRM, and the plan, so advisors stop retyping it. We connect those pieces through documented exports and APIs while your planning tool stays the system of record.
No, AI tools can't replace financial planning software for advisors. Planning tools run tested projections, tax rules, and Monte Carlo analysis that a language model shouldn't improvise. AI works best around them: gathering client data, summarizing a plan in plain words, and preparing the meeting. Keep eMoney, MoneyGuidePro, or RightCapital as the engine.
It can fit SEC and FINRA rules when its notes and messages are kept, reviewed, and supervised like any other record. RIAs keep records under SEC Rule 204-2, and broker-dealers under FINRA Rule 4511 and SEC Rule 17a-4. We send every draft and final to your archive and document each vendor. Your CCO makes the final call.
Yes, in many cases, and asking every client is the safer habit. Several states require every party's consent to record a call, and clients may join from anywhere. Our setup reads a consent notice, records the client's answer, and stops capture if they decline. The advisor can still take manual notes for that meeting.
Your firm owns the prompts, settings, and every vendor account, and client data stays in your CRM, archive, and cloud tenant. Each plan includes 30, 60, or 90 days of post-launch review, when we sample outputs with compliance and tune prompts. After that, keep us for changes or run it with our documentation.
Saimul IslamFounder & CEO, DeveloperLookStill have questions?
Send a message or book a call with the team.
Free 30-min callGoogle Meet
Book a call
In 30 minutes on Google Meet we walk you through how we would build it, how long it takes and what it costs. Then you get a written estimate.
Calendar not showing? Book on cal.com or send a brief.