Citation gap map
The prompts where engines answer your topics, the sources they credit now, and the page that should win each one.
For brands and publishers that want AI answers to quote and credit their pages: rewrites built for citation, sourced facts, and monthly tracking. From $850 per month.
9+
Pages made citable each quarter
100%
Claims with a named source
How your project runs
01 · FreeTeams we have built for:








The Problem
This happens when your pages hold the right knowledge but bury it. Generative engines quote passages they can lift cleanly, and a long, vague intro gives them nothing to credit.
Long intros
The answer sits under 200 words of preamble.
Long intros
Each section opens with the answer in its first two sentences.
Hidden facts
Key numbers live only in images and charts.
Hidden facts
Facts move into plain text and tables that engines can read and quote.
No names
Expert opinions appear with nobody's name on them.
No names
Quotes carry the expert's name, role, and credentials.
Lost credit
Engines reuse your idea but credit another site.
Lost credit
Each passage states your finding plainly, with your brand and source attached.
You ask Perplexity a question your team has answered better than anyone. The reply uses your idea, nearly word for word, and links to a competitor's thinner post. Your guide opens with 200 words of warm-up before the answer. Key numbers sit inside an image. Your expert's opinion has no name on it, and the comparison everyone wants is buried in paragraph nine. Nothing on the page is wrong. It's just hard for a machine to quote, so it quotes someone easier.
We start by finding the prompts where engines already answer your topic and checking which sources they credit. Then we rebuild your priority pages passage by passage: the answer first, facts stated plainly with their source, named experts quoted, and comparisons in real tables. Larger plans add one original data study a quarter. Engines get passages worth crediting, not a wall of intro text.
Passages built to quote
Each section opens with a direct answer that still makes sense when lifted out of the page.
Sources named in the text
Every claim says where it came from, so engines and readers can check it.
Citations tracked monthly
A fixed prompt set shows which of your pages ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews credit.
Our Generative Engine Optimization Services Process
You see which sources engines credit for your topics before you pay. Then you approve the page list, each rewrite, and every data study, and you get a citation report each month.
We run 10 prompts on your core topics in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews and list the sources each one credits. You get a short call on where you're missing and a fixed monthly price.
What's Included
Every plan rebuilds priority pages passage by passage, names a source for every claim, and tracks citations on 4 engines. Larger plans add expert interviews, original data, and competitor reviews.
Compare Options
A content agency publishes more pages, and a freelance writer costs less per article. Here is where each fits for generative search engine optimization, where credit matters more than volume.
| Feature | DeveloperLookBest fit | Content Agency | Freelance Writer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting point | Free check of 10 topic prompts | Keyword list and calendar | Your own brief |
| Page approach | Existing pages rebuilt passage by passage | New posts on a schedule | New posts per brief |
| Sourcing | Source named for every claim | Varies by writer | Varies by writer |
| Expert input | Named quotes from your specialists | Often generic copy | Interviews cost extra |
| Original data | Quarterly study from plan 2 | Sometimes, as a premium | Rarely offered |
| Output volume | 3 to 10 pages a month | More pages each month | Flexible, per article |
| Measurement | Citations on 4 engines | Traffic and rankings | Usually none |
| Monthly cost | From $850 per month | Often a larger retainer | Lower per article |
Projects We've Built
These are publishing, review, and learning websites we designed and built, the kind of content-heavy sites where clear passages and named sources matter most.




What Our Clients Say
Feedback from teams we have built apps, platforms, and websites for.
We had a pretty specific idea of what we wanted our website to become, but I wasn’t sure how easily we could explain all of it to a development team. There were quite a few moving parts, and we were working toward a deadline, so I expected a few things to get lost along the way. That never really happened. They understood what we were trying to achieve, kept us updated throughout the process, and got everything ready within the agreed timeline. The final site feels much easier to navigate, works beautifully on mobile, and is noticeably smoother for our customers. It was a huge relief seeing the original idea actually turn into the website we had in mind.
The mobile experience is probably my favourite part of the new site. We had spent a lot of time making sure the desktop version looked right, and the team kept pushing us to think about how everything would actually feel on a phone too. They were right. The navigation is clean, the interactions feel natural, and everything we’ve tested so far works exactly as it should. They also went through the links, forms, integrations, and other details more than once before launch, which I really appreciated. And even after going live, we could still reach out when something came up. The whole process felt friendly, organised, and surprisingly straightforward.
What I appreciate most is that the website is actually easy for us to manage now. We can update content ourselves instead of sending a developer a message every time we need to change something small. They also paid attention to the technical SEO side, which mattered to us because we didn’t want a new website to create problems for the traffic we already had. I’ve probably asked more questions than I should have since launch, but every question has been handled patiently and without any fuss. The team is easy to work with, they explain things clearly, and when we need something changed, they focus on getting it done rather than making the process complicated.
1,250+
Projects shipped
10+
Years of experience
Top 3%
Upwork Top Rated Plus
5 stars
Average review score
1,250+
Projects shipped
10+
Years of experience
Top 3%
Upwork Top Rated Plus
5 stars
Average review score

Want results like these?
Tell us what you are building. You get a reply within 24 hours on business days, then a written estimate.
Work Culture
GEO is new, and promises about it are cheap. We work from published research and each engine's own documentation, change only what we can measure, and keep your experts in charge of the facts.
Each engine decides which sources it credits, and that can change week to week. We sell the method and honest tracking, not a citation count.
We rewrite a few pages first and watch the fixed prompt set before rolling a pattern across the site. If a change doesn't move citations, we drop it.
We restructure and edit, but your specialists approve every claim and quote. Engines can only credit expertise that's really on the page.
A passage that reads badly to people won't hold up for long. Every rewrite has to work for a human reader before we call it done.
Some topics rarely trigger AI answers, and some sites need technical fixes first. If that's your case, the free check will say so plainly.
Rewrites, data studies, prompt sets, and reports live in your CMS and accounts. Nothing is locked inside our tools when the work ends.
Overview
DeveloperLook provides generative engine optimization services that make your pages easier for AI engines to quote and credit. We map citation gaps, rewrite priority pages passage by passage, source every claim, and track citations in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. Plans start at $850 per month, with first rewrites in 2 weeks.
DEVELOPERLOOK
Project facts · Generative Engine Optimization Services
Reviewed 28 Oct 2026 by Saimul Islam
Good fit
Publishers and media brands
Your guides get paraphrased in AI answers while the citation goes to an aggregator, and you want your original reporting credited instead.
B2B companies with expert content
Your team writes deep guides and comparisons, but Perplexity and ChatGPT credit vendor review sites when buyers ask about your category.
Education and course providers
Your lessons answer student questions thoroughly, yet AI tools quote shorter pages that state the answer in their first sentence.
Leaders asking for a GEO plan
Your leadership read about GEO generative engine optimization and wants a plan, but nobody knows which pages to change first.
UK and Irish marketing teams
You searched for a generative engine optimisation agency and want rewrites in British spelling for buyers in the UK and Ireland.
Not a fit
Need the full AI program
You want crawler access, brand facts, and mentions handled across every engine, not just content. AI SEO Services covers that whole program.
Promised AI citations
You need a contract that promises citations in ChatGPT or Google. No honest provider can sell that, because each engine decides which sources it shows.
Pages lack real expertise
Your content has no named experts or sources yet. E-E-A-T SEO Services builds that trust layer first, which makes rewrites worth citing.
Budget under $850 a month
Your budget is under $850 a month, or only 1 or 2 pages need work. If a one-time Content Refresh fits better, we'll tell you before we quote.
Not sure we're the right fit?
Book a free call or message us. We'll tell you honestly whether we're the right team.
Pricing
These are monthly starting points in USD. Your plan depends on pages rebuilt a month, prompt set size, and original data, and you get a fixed proposal after a free citation check.
For Agencies
You own the client relationship. We work as the generative AI search engine optimization agency behind you: citation gap maps, passage rewrites, and citation reports for your clients, all under your brand.
White label: your client only ever sees your brand
Send the client's topics, site access, competitors, and your report template.
We run the citation check and draft a 90-day page plan in your name.
Your account lead shares each citation report while our editors rewrite the next pages.
Send the client's topics, site access, competitors, and your report template.
We run the citation check and draft a 90-day page plan in your name.
Your account lead shares each citation report while our editors rewrite the next pages.
The Right Technology for Your Project
We test prompts in each engine directly, pull queries from Search Console, and edit in shared docs your experts already use for review.
FAQ
Straight answers on cost, timing, how GEO differs from SEO, and how citation results are measured.
Saimul IslamFounder & CEO, DeveloperLookStill have questions?
Send a message or book a call with the team.
Plans start at $850 per month for Citation Starter. That covers a citation gap map for 40 prompts, 3 rewritten pages a month, and tracking on 4 engines. Citation Program costs $1,400 per month and adds expert interviews and a quarterly data study. Citation Leadership costs $2,100 per month for 10 pages a month and up to 4 topic clusters.
First rewrites go live within 2 weeks, and citation changes usually build over 2 to 4 months. Engines that search the live web can reflect a rebuilt page soon after they recrawl it. Answers that lean on wider reputation move slower. We track the same prompt set each month, so you see real movement instead of a lucky screenshot.
It's the practice of shaping content so AI search engines can find, quote, and credit it in generated answers, often shortened to GEO. The term comes from a 2023 research paper, GEO: Generative Engine Optimization, that studied how content changes affect visibility in those answers. In practice it means answer-first passages, sourced facts, and named expertise.
It works by making each passage easy to lift and safe to credit. Engines retrieve pages, pick passages that answer the prompt, and cite some of them. So we put the answer first, state facts plainly with their source, quote named experts, and use tables for comparisons. Then we track which prompts start citing the rebuilt pages.
It matters because more research now ends in an AI answer instead of a click on a list of links. If an engine uses your knowledge but credits a competitor, you lose the visit and the brand moment. GEO helps your pages become the source that gets named, which keeps your expertise visible as search changes.
No, but it builds on it. Traditional SEO helps pages rank in a list of results, while GEO helps passages get quoted inside a generated answer. Both need crawlable, helpful pages. GEO adds passage structure, attributed facts, and citation tracking, and it judges success by credits in answers rather than positions on a results page.
We measure it with a fixed prompt set rerun every month on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. For each prompt we log whether you're cited, mentioned, or absent, and which page earned it. AI referral visits from GA4 and Search Console clicks show whether citations bring traffic. A fixed set keeps trends honest.
No. It works best for sites that answer questions buyers or readers ask: publishers, B2B companies, education providers, and expert services. A small local shop or a site with little content gains less, because few prompts lead to its pages. The free citation check tells you whether your topics trigger AI answers often enough.
Use them to turn expertise you already have into passages AI engines credit, without pulling your team off their work. A service brings a tested rewrite pattern, a fixed prompt set, and tracking across 4 engines. When you compare generative engine optimization companies, ask whether they rewrite pages or only sell a tracking dashboard.
They rework existing pages for quoting rather than chasing rankings for new keywords. A traditional SEO service targets positions, links, and technical health. GEO services rebuild passages, add sources and expert quotes, create original data, and report citations across engines. Many teams run both, since a page must be crawlable and trusted before any engine can cite it.
Saimul IslamFounder & CEO, DeveloperLookStill have questions?
Send a message or book a call with the team.
Free 30-min callGoogle Meet
Book a call
In 30 minutes on Google Meet we walk you through how we would build it, how long it takes and what it costs. Then you get a written estimate.
Calendar not showing? Book on cal.com or send a brief.