Matter-close review requests
One request per client when the matter closes, by email or by text with recorded consent.
Loading, please wait...
3X
More new Google reviews
Teams we have built for:








The Problem
Satisfied clients move on with their lives. An unhappy one posts at midnight, and prospects read it before they call.
Your firm settled a hard custody case last month, and the client cried with relief in your office.
We start with one request every client receives when a matter closes, by email or text, with nothing offered in return.
Your practice software triggers it, so no one picks who gets asked. We watch Google, Avvo, and Justia, draft replies that reveal nothing about the matter, and flag only reviews that break platform policies. You get steady reviews from real clients, not a spike from a gift card campaign.
Every closed matter asked
One request per client at matter close, triggered by your practice software, not a staff pick.
Replies that reveal nothing
Drafts that respond without confirming a representation or sharing case details.
Testimonials with disclaimers
Client quotes and case results shown with the context your state bar expects.
Our Review Program Process
You approve the request wording, the timing, the reply rules, and every testimonial before anything reaches a client or the web.
What's Included
Every plan covers matter-close review requests, monitoring, reply drafts, and a monthly report. Larger plans add attorney profiles, testimonial pages, and more offices.
Compare Options
If you're comparing the best reputation management software for law firms, a subscription tool sends requests cheaply. Here's where software alone and staff effort fall short.
| Feature | DeveloperLookBest fit | Review software alone | In-house staff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who gets asked | Every client at close | Whoever staff enter | Whoever staff remember |
| Request wording | Checked against bar rules | Vendor templates | Written ad hoc |
| What triggers it | Practice software event | Manual or CSV upload | From memory |
| Reply drafts | Reveal nothing confidential | AI suggestions, unchecked | Risk of oversharing |
| Bad reviews | Flagged by policy only | Alerts only | Often argued publicly |
| Setup speed | About 2 weeks | Same day | Whenever there's time |
| Testimonial display | With bar disclaimers | Widget, no disclaimers | Rarely published |
| Typical cost | From $600 per month | Low monthly fee | Staff hours |
Projects We've Built
A review platform, booking flows, and professional service sites we designed and built. Testimonials need a site that shows them with context.
What Our Clients Say
Feedback from teams whose sites and client flows we built.
We had a pretty specific idea of what we wanted our website to become, but I wasn’t sure how easily we could explain all of it to a development team. There were quite a few moving parts, and we were working toward a deadline, so I expected a few things to get lost along the way. That never really happened. They understood what we were trying to achieve, kept us updated throughout the process, and got everything ready within the agreed timeline. The final site feels much easier to navigate, works beautifully on mobile, and is noticeably smoother for our customers. It was a huge relief seeing the original idea actually turn into the website we had in mind.
The mobile experience is probably my favourite part of the new site. We had spent a lot of time making sure the desktop version looked right, and the team kept pushing us to think about how everything would actually feel on a phone too. They were right. The navigation is clean, the interactions feel natural, and everything we’ve tested so far works exactly as it should. They also went through the links, forms, integrations, and other details more than once before launch, which I really appreciated. And even after going live, we could still reach out when something came up. The whole process felt friendly, organised, and surprisingly straightforward.
What I appreciate most is that the website is actually easy for us to manage now. We can update content ourselves instead of sending a developer a message every time we need to change something small. They also paid attention to the technical SEO side, which mattered to us because we didn’t want a new website to create problems for the traffic we already had. I’ve probably asked more questions than I should have since launch, but every question has been handled patiently and without any fuss. The team is easy to work with, they explain things clearly, and when we need something changed, they focus on getting it done rather than making the process complicated.
1,000+
Projects shipped
10+
Years of experience
Top 3%
Upwork Top Rated Plus
5 stars
Average review score
Work Culture
Reviews touch client confidentiality, bar advertising rules, and federal rules on fake reviews. These habits keep your reputation work defensible.
Overview
DeveloperLook provides law firm reputation management that asks every client for a review when a matter closes, with nothing offered in return. The monthly program covers review requests, monitoring on Google, Avvo, and Justia, confidential reply drafts, and testimonial pages with disclaimers. Plans start at $600 per month, and requests go live in about 2 weeks.
Your clients thank you in person, but your profile shows a dozen reviews while the firm across town shows hundreds.
Your former client posted an angry review with details that aren't true, and you're unsure what you're allowed to say back.
You close matters every week and want review requests sent automatically, with no staff member deciding who gets asked.
Your firm has several attorneys, and you want attorney reputation management that builds each lawyer's Avvo and Google profile.
Your agency manages marketing for law firms and needs legal review generation that each firm's partners can defend to their bar.
You want map rankings, categories, and directory cleanup more than reviews. Local SEO for Lawyers covers that side of the map.
You want negative reviews removed because you disagree with them. Google removes only reviews that break its policies, and we won't pretend otherwise.
You need a new website before testimonials have somewhere to live. Law Firm Website Design Services comes first.
Your budget is under $600 per month. Google's free review link and a request your staff sends can be a solid start.
Not sure we're the right fit?
Send a two-line brief. We'll tell you honestly whether we're the right team.
Pricing
These are monthly starting points in USD. Your plan depends on matter volume, attorneys, and offices, and you get a fixed proposal after a free reputation audit.
For one office that wants every client asked and every review watched.
$600/month
For multi-attorney firms building each lawyer's profile and a testimonials page.
$1,000/month
For firms with several offices and practices that need every profile managed.
$1,500/month
For Agencies
You keep the law firm client. We run ethical Google review automation for lawyers under your brand: request flows, monitoring, and confidential reply drafts, with every template approved by the firm's responsible attorney.
Send the firm's offices, attorneys, practice software, and review profiles.
We draft templates, connect the trigger, and start monitoring within 2 weeks.
You get branded review and response reports to share with the firm.
The Right Technology for Your Project
We connect your practice software to email and text tools, then watch the review sites your prospects check.
FAQ
Straight answers on cost, bar rules for reviews, automated requests, negative reviews, and testimonials.
Plans start at $600 per month for one office's review requests, monitoring on Google, Avvo, and Justia, and reply drafts. Firm-wide programs with software triggers and a testimonials page start at $1,000 per month, and multi-office programs start at $1,500 per month. A free reputation audit sets the fixed price.
Most firms send their first requests about 2 weeks after the audit, once the wording is approved and the trigger is tested. New reviews usually follow within the first month. Your overall rating moves more slowly, since each new review is a small share of the total.
Ask every client for an honest review, not a 5-star one, and offer nothing for it. Google bars incentives and selective asking, and ABA Model Rule 7.2(b) restricts giving value for recommendations. Some states also restrict testimonials themselves, so your responsible attorney confirms the rules before the first request goes out.
It triggers when a matter closes, whatever the outcome, not only after a win. Clio's matter_closed webhook fires when a matter's status changes to Closed, and the request goes out by email or text. Sending only after favorable results would be selective asking, which Google's policy prohibits.
You can monitor every review, but you can't suppress honest ones, even harsh ones. We check Google, Avvo, Justia, and Yelp daily, then flag reviews that break a platform's policy, such as fake or off-topic posts. Suspected defamation goes to your counsel, since the FTC's review rule bars unfounded legal threats.
They answer every prospect's real question: what was it like to work with this lawyer? Google reviews appear beside your map listing, and Google says more reviews can help your local ranking. Avvo and Justia reviews sit on attorney profiles people check before calling, so recent reviews on all three matter.
Show only real, approved quotes with the client's written consent, plus the context your state bar requires. For case results, a disclaimer that outcomes depend on each case's facts helps, as comment 3 to ABA Model Rule 7.1 explains. We skip review star markup on your own site, since Google treats it as self-serving.
Keep the reply short, or don't reply, and share nothing about the matter. ABA Formal Opinion 496 found that a negative online review alone doesn't let a lawyer reveal client information. A calm line inviting the person to call the office is usually the safest reply.
Only reviews that break a platform's policy can be removed, and the platform decides, not us. Google removes reviews that violate its content policies and offers a one-time appeal if a report is denied. Honest negative reviews stay, so the lasting fix is more reviews from satisfied clients.
Your firm owns every profile, review, and client list. We work with the access you grant and keep client data inside your own tools. If you stop, your request flow keeps running from your own accounts, and your review history stays exactly where it is.
Book a call
Pick a 30-minute slot that works for you. We meet on Google Meet to align on goals, scope, and the right next step.