Login HR Staffing App Design & Development
- HR & Staffing
- Portal
- Dashboard
The Problem
A Buyer Asked for Your Accessibility Report and the Deal Stopped
It shows up in a security questionnaire, a public sector RFP, or a university renewal. Usually it comes with a due date and an edition name you don't recognize.
Memory-filled rows
Every criterion says Supports because nobody tested it.
Memory-filled rows
Each row comes from a logged test on your current release.
Wrong edition
The buyer wanted EN 301 549, you sent a 508 report.
Wrong edition
We confirm the edition and standard with you before testing starts.
Vague remarks
Remarks say mostly accessible, which reviewers read as untested.
Vague remarks
Remarks name the screen, the issue, and any workaround a user has.
Stale report
The report predates your new editor and dashboard.
Stale report
Each report is dated, versioned, and tied to the product release it covers.
Your biggest prospect sent a procurement checklist, and line 14 asks for a current ACR. The one you have was written two years ago, on an older edition, for a product that has since gained a dashboard and a new editor. Someone on your team filled it in from memory, so every row says Supports. The buyer's accessibility lead tabs through your login page, finds a keyboard trap, and now doubts the whole document. The deal waits while you scramble.
We start with the buyer's request: which edition, which standard, and when it's due. Then we test your product by hand with a keyboard, screen readers, zoom, and code review, and log every result. Each row of your report gets an honest conformance level and a remark a reviewer can verify. You approve the draft, and you get a document that survives a buyer who tests.
Edition chosen for your buyer
The 508, EU, WCAG, or INT edition, matched to the request in front of you.
Every row tested by hand
Keyboard, screen reader, and zoom checks on the product areas your buyer will use.
Remarks reviewers can verify
Conformance levels and remarks a procurement reviewer can confirm by opening your product.
Our VPAT Services Process
From Buyer Request to Signed-Off ACR in Five Clear Steps
You confirm the edition and scope, see test results as they're logged, review the draft report, and decide what goes to your buyer.
We read the buyer's request, the edition they named, their due date, and any report you already have. You get a scope and a fixed price. If ITI's free template and your own recent tests would satisfy this buyer, we'll tell you before we quote.
Projects We've Built
SaaS Platforms and Apps We Have Built
HR, e-learning, and finance platforms our team designed and built. They weren't VPAT projects, but logins, dashboards, and editors like these are what an ACR describes.
Oasic Finance SaaS Web Design & Development
- Finance
- SaaS Platform
- Dashboard
Edutech E-Learning Web Design & Development
- Education
- Dashboard
- E-commerce
Upsen HR Management App Design & Development
- HR & Staffing
- Dashboard
- Mobile App
What's Included
What You Get With a VPAT Report Built From Testing
An edition chosen for your buyer, hands-on product testing, a report with honest levels and specific remarks, notes on failing rows, and support while the buyer reviews it.
Compare Options
DeveloperLook vs DIY Template vs Scan-Based Generator
A DIY template works when your team already tests thoroughly. A scan-based generator is fast for a first look. Here is where each holds up in a procurement review.
| Feature | DeveloperLookBest fit | DIY template | Scan-based generator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edition choice | Matched to the buyer's request | Whatever edition you download | Usually one fixed format |
| Testing behind rows | Manual keyboard and screen reader | Depends on your team | Automated scan results only |
| Conformance levels | Earned per criterion | Often optimistic | Guessed for manual criteria |
| Remarks | Screen, issue, and workaround | Short or blank | Generic templated text |
| Speed | 2 to 6 weeks with testing | Fast if you have results | Minutes to generate |
| Cost | From $600, fixed scope | Free template, staff time | Subscription fee |
| Buyer follow-up | 30 days of Q&A included | Your team answers | Not included |
| Holds up when tested | Only if testing was real | Often fails manual checks |
DeveloperLook
DIY template
- Edition choice
- DeveloperLook: Matched to the buyer's requestDIY template: Whatever edition you download
- Testing behind rows
- DeveloperLook: Manual keyboard and screen readerDIY template: Depends on your team
- Conformance levels
- DeveloperLook: Earned per criterionDIY template: Often optimistic
- Remarks
- DeveloperLook: Screen, issue, and workaroundDIY template: Short or blank
- Speed
- DeveloperLook: 2 to 6 weeks with testingDIY template: Fast if you have results
- Cost
- DeveloperLook: From $600, fixed scopeDIY template: Free template, staff time
- Buyer follow-up
- DeveloperLook: 30 days of Q&A includedDIY template: Your team answers
- Holds up when tested
- DeveloperLook: DIY template: Only if testing was real
What Our Clients Say
What Clients Say After Launch
Feedback from teams we have built websites, platforms, and apps for.
We had a pretty specific idea of what we wanted our website to become, but I wasn’t sure how easily we could explain all of it to a development team. There were quite a few moving parts, and we were working toward a deadline, so I expected a few things to get lost along the way. That never really happened. They understood what we were trying to achieve, kept us updated throughout the process, and got everything ready within the agreed timeline. The final site feels much easier to navigate, works beautifully on mobile, and is noticeably smoother for our customers. It was a huge relief seeing the original idea actually turn into the website we had in mind.
The mobile experience is probably my favourite part of the new site. We had spent a lot of time making sure the desktop version looked right, and the team kept pushing us to think about how everything would actually feel on a phone too. They were right. The navigation is clean, the interactions feel natural, and everything we’ve tested so far works exactly as it should. They also went through the links, forms, integrations, and other details more than once before launch, which I really appreciated. And even after going live, we could still reach out when something came up. The whole process felt friendly, organised, and surprisingly straightforward.
What I appreciate most is that the website is actually easy for us to manage now. We can update content ourselves instead of sending a developer a message every time we need to change something small. They also paid attention to the technical SEO side, which mattered to us because we didn’t want a new website to create problems for the traffic we already had. I’ve probably asked more questions than I should have since launch, but every question has been handled patiently and without any fuss. The team is easy to work with, they explain things clearly, and when we need something changed, they focus on getting it done rather than making the process complicated.
1,250+
Projects shipped
10+
Years of experience
5 stars
Clutch rating
5 stars
GoodFirms rating
Excellent
Trustpilot rating
Top 3%
Upwork Top Rated Plus
1,250+
Projects shipped
10+
Years of experience
5 stars
Clutch rating
5 stars
GoodFirms rating
Excellent
Trustpilot rating
Top 3%
Upwork Top Rated Plus
Want results like these?
Tell us what you are building. You get a reply within 24 hours on business days, then a written estimate.
Work Culture
Why Software Vendors Trust Us With Their ACR
Your report goes to buyers under your company name, and some of them will test your product. These habits keep every row honest and every claim defensible.
Honest conformance levels
Partially Supports with a clear remark reads better to a reviewer than a Supports that fails on first click. We write the level your product earned.
No certification claims
No official body certifies accessibility reports, and we don't pretend otherwise. You get a tested, dated report, which is what buyers actually ask for.
People test, tools assist
Scanners miss most keyboard, focus, and screen reader problems. Every row gets a manual check, and automated results only confirm what we found by hand.
Remarks a buyer can verify
Each remark names a screen and a behavior your buyer can check in minutes. Specific remarks build trust, while vague ones invite a full re-test.
Tied to your release
Every report carries the product version and test date. When you ship a major release, we update only the rows that changed instead of starting over.
Your report, your name
You own the final document and publish it under your company. We keep the test log, so you can answer any row with evidence later.
Overview
What do VPAT services include for SaaS and software vendors?
DeveloperLook provides VPAT services for SaaS and software vendors facing a procurement review. We pick the edition your buyer asked for, test your product by hand, and write each row with an honest level and a specific remark. Reports start at $600 from your recent test results, and most take 1 to 6 weeks with a fixed scope.
DEVELOPERLOOK
Project facts · VPAT Services
- Service
- VPAT Services (edition choice, product testing, ACR writing, buyer Q&A)
- Typical timeline
- 1 to 2 weeks from your results, 2 to 6 weeks with testing
- Platforms
- Web apps, SaaS platforms, desktop software, iOS and Android apps
- Built with
- ITI's template, NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver, axe DevTools
- Experience
- 10+ years of development experience and 1,250+ shipped projects
- Post-launch support
- 30 days of buyer Q&A after delivery
- Communication
- Calls in US, UK, and AU business hours
- Starting price
- From $600 USD, fixed scope after a free buyer review
Reviewed 27 Oct 2026 by Saimul Islam
Good fit
SaaS vendors with a deal waiting
Your enterprise buyer sent a procurement questionnaire, and the deal is on hold until you send a current accessibility report for the product they're licensing.
Vendors with an outdated report
Your last report was written three releases ago on an older edition, and a buyer just noticed it doesn't mention your new dashboard.
Edtech vendors selling to universities
Your university customer's procurement office wants an ACR before renewal, and your product handles student coursework, grades, and messages.
Software sellers entering the EU
You're selling software to EU public bodies or companies and need an EU edition report mapped to EN 301 549.
Agencies with software clients
Your agency built a client's platform, and the client now needs a VPAT audit and report you can deliver under your brand.
Not a fit
Fixes needed first
Your product has known accessibility failures you want fixed before any report goes out. Section 508 Compliance Services tests, fixes, and then writes the ACR.
Marketing website only
You need to check a marketing website, not software you license to buyers. WCAG Audit Services gives a developer report without a procurement document.
You want a certificate
Your buyer asked for an accessibility certificate. No VPAT certification exists, so the right answer is an honest ACR, and we'll help you explain that.
Budget under $600
Your budget is under $600 and your team tests carefully. Filling in ITI's free template yourself is a fair start, and we can review it later.
Not sure we're the right fit?
Book a free call or message us. We'll tell you honestly whether we're the right team.
Pricing
Transparent Starting Prices for VPAT Services
These are starting points in USD. Your final price depends on how many screens and platforms the report covers and which edition you need. You get a fixed proposal after a free buyer review.
For Agencies
White-Label Accessibility Report Writing for Agencies
You own the client relationship. We supply the product testing and ACR writing behind it, delivered in your format and under your brand. Your client gets a defensible report, and you get a repeatable service to offer every software client.
How the partnership works
White label: your client only ever sees your brand
Your clientSees only your brand
You, the agencyOwn the relationship
DeveloperLookBehind your brand
Share the request
Send the buyer's request, product access, and due date, and we scope it.
- Client needs
- You share the details
- Details received
We test and write
We test the product and draft the ACR for your review before your client sees it.
- Scope and plan
- Proposal to resell
- Your quoteYOUR LOGO
You deliver it
Your client receives the final report from you, ready for the buyer.
- Done by our team
- Your brand on it
- Handed to your clientDone
- Your client
- You, the agency
- DeveloperLook
Share the request
Send the buyer's request, product access, and due date, and we scope it.
- Client needs
- You share the details
- Details received
We test and write
We test the product and draft the ACR for your review before your client sees it.
- Scope and plan
- Proposal to resell
- Your quoteYOUR LOGO
You deliver it
Your client receives the final report from you, ready for the buyer.
- Done by our team
- Your brand on it
- Handed to your clientDone
Partner with DeveloperLookDelivered under your brand
The Right Technology for Your Project
Technology Stack
Manual test tools and assistive technology come first, then the product stacks we read code in and the formats your buyers expect.
Chrome DevTools
Lighthouse- axe DevTools
- Accessibility Insights
- Keyboard-only testing
- NVDA
- JAWS
- VoiceOver
- TalkBack
- Browser zoom and magnifier
React- Angular
Vue.js
TypeScript
Flutter- Swift
- ITI VPAT template
- Adobe Acrobat
Google Sheets
Loom
01 / 04
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Straight answers on cost, getting a report, editions, testing, compliance, and certification.
Saimul IslamFounder & CEO, DeveloperLookStill have questions?
Send a message or book a call with the team.
DeveloperLook's reports start at $600 for one ACR written from your recent test results, with spot checks on 5 key screens. The $1,900 plan adds hands-on testing of up to 15 screens and flows plus fix notes. The $3,600 plan covers the INT edition, web and mobile screens, and one refresh after your next major release.
You get one by testing your product against the standard your buyer named, then filling in ITI's template with the results. Download the right edition, test each criterion on your current release, and write a level and remark for every row. With our help, that takes 1 to 2 weeks from existing results, or 2 to 6 weeks with testing.
A Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT) is a document template from the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), currently in version 2.5Rev. Vendors use it to record a product's accessibility criterion by criterion, and the completed document is called an Accessibility Conformance Report, or ACR. Buyers in government, higher education, and large companies ask for it during procurement to compare products.
VPAT stands for Voluntary Product Accessibility Template. Voluntary means no law makes a vendor publish one, but many buyers won't purchase without it. The template has editions for Section 508, the EU standard EN 301 549, and WCAG. An INT edition combines all three, and your buyer's request decides which one you fill in.
It's the completed report, with product details, evaluation methods, and tables of accessibility criteria. Each table row lists a criterion, a conformance level, and remarks. The front page names the product version, the test date, and who prepared it. Every A and AA row needs an answer, since Not Evaluated is allowed only for AAA criteria.
It usually means the completed ACR, the document a buyer asks for when they say send us your accessibility report. It isn't the same as a website accessibility statement, which is a short public page about your commitment and contact details. Software vendors often need both: the ACR for procurement and a statement page for users.
VPAT compliance isn't a status you can reach, because the template only documents how your product conforms. What buyers check is whether your report is accurate and whether the product meets their required standard, often WCAG 2.1 AA or Section 508. A report full of Does Not Support rows is still a valid report.
VPAT accessibility means how your product performs for people with disabilities, as written up in the report. It covers keyboard use, screen reader support, color contrast, captions, zoom, and error handling. The report turns that into rows a buyer can compare across vendors, so your product's real behavior is what decides each level.
VPAT testing is the hands-on accessibility testing behind each row of the report. Testers use a keyboard, screen readers such as NVDA, JAWS, and VoiceOver, and browser zoom, and they inspect the code. Automated scans help, but they can't judge most criteria on their own. Without real testing, conformance levels are guesses, and buyers who test will notice.
There is no official VPAT certification, and no one certifies products against the template. ITI publishes the template but doesn't review or approve completed reports. When a buyer asks for certification, they usually want a current, tested ACR. Some buyers also run their own accessibility tests, which an honest report prepares you for.
Saimul IslamFounder & CEO, DeveloperLookStill have questions?
Send a message or book a call with the team.
Free 30-min callGoogle Meet
Book a call
Book a free 30-minute call
In 30 minutes on Google Meet we walk you through how we would build it, how long it takes and what it costs. Then you get a written estimate.
Calendar not showing? Book on cal.com or send a brief.